ABSTRACT
Gastric contents in the respiratory tract are commonly found at postmortem in acute alcoholism, occasionally during a fit of epilepsy and in dead bodies that have started decomposing. Quite infrequently it may be found in fresh bodies that have undergone sudden unexpected and unattended death leading to a dilemma as to the real cause of death with dearth of any other substantial evidence. Dead body of a 36-year-old lady was brought for post-mortem examination with history of unattended and unexpected death while taking bath after her afternoon meal. On gross and histopathological examination, there was no significant finding in the cardiovascular system but respiratory tract contained gastric contents with histopathology confirming vegetable matter in the terminal bronchioles. The conflicting literature on the difference between antemortem aspiration and postmortem spill of gastric contents into the respiratory tract led to a dilemma as to the real cause of death in present case. Dilemmas of the case with difficulties in diagnosis are being presented herewith.
Subject(s)
Asphyxia/etiology , Autopsy , Death, Sudden/diagnosis , Female , Forensic Pathology , Humans , Respiratory Aspiration of Gastric Contents/anatomy & histology , Respiratory Aspiration of Gastric Contents/diagnosis , Respiratory Aspiration of Gastric Contents/epidemiologyABSTRACT
The objective of the present study is to observe the spectrum of histopathological changes in the testicular biopsies of infertile men and to assess if a bilateral biopsy is required to reveal the pathology of infertility in every case or a unilateral biopsy would suffice. Thirty testicular biopsies (21 bilateral and 9 unilateral) were studied from 30 infertile men. The patterns of testicular damage seen in the present study were maturation arrest followed by hypospermatogenesis, Sertoli-cell only syndrome, tubular hyalinisation and one case was associated with normal histology. Comparing the histopathological findings in bilateral biopsies, it was seen that a unilateral biopsy would suffice to reveal the pathology in most instances and a bilateral biopsy is needed only when there is appreciable difference in the size of the testes.